Event 2


Furthermore, Brakhage approaches his movies in a very unique way. His films are more analogous to visual poetry than your typical story-telling motif. Brakhage utilizes technology in his filmmaking which allows him to speed up images so they look different to the human eye. In addition, none of his videos contained sounds which allowed for his audiences to focus solely on the visuals. Though I found it challenging to stay engaged in the beginning, my attention grew stronger as the movie went on. In Mothlight, Brakhage taped moth wings, twigs, and leaves onto clear film and made prints from it. The pictures were played really fast in succession I found it hard to look at the detail of the moths. I did not know what I was looking at first. All I could see was flashing art. Then I remembered the name of the film and started to look for moths. My eyes were glued to the film because I did not want to miss a single image. I wanted to know the significance of the film and how it represented a metaphor. Ken Kelman describes the film as “A paradoxical preservation of pieces of dead moths in the eternal medium of light (which is life and draws the moth to death); so it flutters through its very disintegration"(Kelman 1). Truly I found Brakhage's work to be both bold and refreshing. His way of filmmaking is not what I'm used to but it does convey his message strongly. I can see why he refers to his work as visual music or moving visual thinking.
References
FANTASMALOGIC. “Mothlight, De Stan Brakhage, 1963, 4'.” YouTube, YouTube, 3 Dec. 2010, www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EO264yUxDo&t=11s.
Kelman, Ken. “Metaphors on Vision | UCLA Film & Television Archive.” Rodney King Case and the Los Angeles Uprising | UCLA Film & Television Archive, www.cinema.ucla.edu/events/2018/04/13/metaphors-on-vision.
Starnes, Sadie R. “Stan Brakhage: Metaphors on Vision.” The Brooklyn Rail, brooklynrail.org/2017/10/art_books/Metaphors-on-Vision.
Vesna, Victoria. “Toward a Third Culture: Being In Between.”Leonardo, vol. 34, no. 2, 2001, pp. 121–125., doi:10.1162/002409401750184672.
Comments
Post a Comment